Jeffrey Epstein was a 'created construct' used for blackmail, security expert claims

A world-renowned security expert and author has claimed that Jeffrey Epstein was a "created construct," a tool used to blackmail governments. In an interview on 'The Diary Of A CEO', Gavin de Becker—the founder of Gavin de Becker & Associates, which protects and advises many of the world's most prominent public figures—also said that Epstein "wasn't a billionaire." While his claim may sound sensational—almost bordering on conspiracy—de Becker isn't the only person advancing such arguments. The points he raises stem from questions that continue to fuel speculation around the Epstein Files, beyond the horrors of the crimes and the ongoing debate over accountability.

In a little over a month since the United States Department of Justice released a staggering 3.5 million pages of records—including 2,000 videos and 180,000 images—related to a decades-long child sex-trafficking racket, more questions have continued to dominate headlines. The Epstein Files Transparency Act, a court-mandated transparency effort by the U.S. government, released the documents on January 30, with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche stating that it constituted the "bulk" of the files. Several U.S. lawmakers, however, have since increased pressure to release the rest, often directing their criticism at the President.

In his interview with 'The Diary of a CEO' host and creator Steven Bartlett, de Becker questioned the "highly suspect" nature of Epstein's wealth. "$500 million came from Les Wexner," the security expert said, adding that it was likely only one among several avenues through which Epstein received money, while suggesting that the reasons behind those transfers remain ambiguous. De Becker argued that Epstein was a "created construct" designed to gather compromising leverage over powerful figures in government.

"My take on it is that there was a profound public operation going on to the benefit of probably more than one government (but at least one government)," de Becker said, adding, "What he was is a construct. He is a created construct… While it's a real name—Jeffrey Epstein—and he has a real birth certificate and grew up in a real way, the picture that is presented to the world is not authentic. It is not accurate to who he was."

Despite the more than three million files released, the Epstein documents do not cite any co-conspirator to the child sex trafficker, and prosecutions connected to the case have often intersected with issues of national security. Prince Andrew, for example, saw his legal battles in the United States culminate in a multi-million-dollar out-of-court settlement with Virginia Giuffre.

However, de Becker's narrative about a "global blackmail front" is far from universally accepted. Many legal experts argue that the absence of co-conspirator indictments in the recent document release is not evidence of a deep-state cover-up. Instead, they say decades-old testimony, heavily redacted logs, and the involvement of influential individuals make it difficult to build new criminal cases.

​

Meanwhile, a section of lawmakers argues that the DOJ is still withholding the full truth. Nancy Mace and Thomas Massie have led a bipartisan push for unredacted access, suggesting that the alleged "client list" remains a protected secret. In the most recent major development related to the files, former President Bill Clinton testified before the House Committee, claiming that he had remained entirely unaware of Epstein's illicit activities.