DOJ invokes 'Trump Derangement Syndrome' in bizarre court filing backing White House ballroom

"The National Trust for Historic Preservation is a beautiful name, but even their name is FAKE," part of the filing read
PUBLISHED APR 28, 2026
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche speaks as U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro and FBI Director Kash Patel listen, at a press conference at the Department of Justice on April 27, 2026 (Cover Image Source: Getty Images | Photo by Tasos Katopodis)
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche speaks as U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro and FBI Director Kash Patel listen, at a press conference at the Department of Justice on April 27, 2026 (Cover Image Source: Getty Images | Photo by Tasos Katopodis)

In an unconventional motion filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on Monday, the Department of Justice abandoned traditional legalese in favor of rhetoric that appears to mirror President Donald Trump's Truth Social posts. Seeking the dissolution of a court-ordered injunction against President Trump's controversial $400 million ballroom project, the DOJ attacked the National Trust for Historic Preservation in all caps.

Todd Blanche, joined by President Donald Trump, speaks at a press conference on recent Supreme Court rulings in the briefing room at the White House on June 27, 2025, in Washington, DC (Cover Image Source: Getty Images | Photo by Joe Raedle)
Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, joined by President Donald Trump, speaks at a press conference on Supreme Court rulings in the briefing room at the White House on June 27, 2025, in Washington, DC  Image Source: Getty Images | Photo by Joe Raedle)

"The National Trust for Historic Preservation is a beautiful name, but even their name is FAKE because when they add the words 'in the United States'... it makes it sound like a Governmental Agency, which it is not," the DOJ wrote in its filing, calling the 76-year-old congressionally chartered nonprofit "very bad for our Country."

The document claims that the National Trust's efforts to protect the historic character of the White House were actually meant to block the project for political reasons. The filing states, "They stop many projects that are worthy, and hurt many others. In this case, they are trying to stop one that is vital to our National Security, and the Safety of all Presidents of the United States, both current and future, their families, staff, and Cabinet members."



In a language that can be considered both political and partisan in nature, the government's legal counsel then argued that the Trust's decision to oppose the White House ballroom construction in court stemmed from 'Trump Derangement Syndrome'; this claim was reiterated in the document a second time, this time in all caps.

"If any other President had the ability, foresight, or talents necessary, to build this ballroom, which will be one of the greatest, safest, and most secure structures of its kind anywhere in the World, there would never have been a lawsuit,” the filing read. "But, because it is DONALD J. TRUMP, a highly successful real estate developer, who has abilities that others don't, especially those who assume the Office of President, this frivolous and meritless lawsuit was filed. Again, it's called TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME."



A key part of the DOJ's argument was the recent attack at the White House Correspondents' Dinner. The DOJ, repeating the views of many Republican lawmakers, argued that the ballroom is needed for national security. The filing stated, "Presidents need a secure space for large events, that currently does not exist in Washington, D.C., and this Court's injunction stalling this Project cannot defensibly continue, for the sake of the safety of President Trump, future Presidents, and their families, Cabinets, and staff."

In response to the DOJ's request to drop the lawsuit, National Trust President and CEO Carol Quillen said the organization does not oppose a meeting space at the White House, but any construction must follow legal procedures. "We have always acknowledged the utility of a larger meeting space at the White House. Building it lawfully requires the approval of Congress, which the Administration could seek at any time," Quillen stated.

MORE STORIES

Trump's remarks came just a day after Blanche testified before a House Appropriations subcommittee about the DOJ's 'anti-weaponization fund'
4 hours ago
Reich shared a video in which he explained three ways in which the President was trying to "sabotage our elections"
4 hours ago
Earlier, Pam Bondi had reportedly pointed the finger squarely at Blanche and Patel for the handling of the Epstein files
5 hours ago
"We're building something in front of the White House that's quite attractive to a lot of people," President Trump said
6 hours ago
"Good people were silenced because they stood up for our audience," Pelley said in a statement
8 hours ago
Several Democrats questioned Bill Pulte's appointment as the Acting Director of National Intelligence
8 hours ago
While most presidents release the results of a medical exam once per year, Trump has gone through four since taking office
11 hours ago
Ivey rebuked the Acting Attorney General's claim that the U.S. Constitution allows the president to grant pardons without explanation
11 hours ago
"It will eliminate some jobs, and those jobs will have to be replaced with new jobs," Rubio said
1 day ago
AI is on track to generate trillions in wealth, and right now virtually all of it flows to a handful of private shareholders, according to Sanders
1 day ago