Despite firing, Pam Bondi must testify on Epstein files, House members insist

Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.), who forced the vote on the subpoena last month, said that the subpoena still stands despite Bondi's firing
PUBLISHED APR 4, 2026
Former U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi answers questions from the media (Cover Image Source: Getty Images | Photo by Matt McClain)
Former U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi answers questions from the media (Cover Image Source: Getty Images | Photo by Matt McClain)

Despite President Donald Trump's administration firing Attorney General Pam Bondi days ahead of her scheduled testimony on the Department of Justice's handling of the Epstein files, House members have said that Bondi will still need to testify before the House Oversight Committee. Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.), who forced the vote on the subpoena last month, told Axios that the subpoena still stands as she did it by name and "not as the sitting Attorney General."

Pam Bondi listens as U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a lunch with the Trump Kennedy Center Board Members. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
Pam Bondi listens as U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a lunch with the Trump Kennedy Center Board Members (Image Source: Getty Images | Photo by Alex Wong)

Democratic Sen. Mark Warner claimed that Bondi "severely obstructed and carelessly mishandled" the Epstein files and used the Department of Justice for "political retribution." Rep. Shontel Brown (D-OH) said that the former Attorney General was "obligated to adhere to our subpoena and appear before the Oversight Committee." Bondi's firing from her role led to the leader of the Oversight Committee, Rep. James Comer (R-Kentucky), saying that the next steps were yet to be decided, as per a Washington Post report. Comer said that he would have to confer with Republicans in the committee before deciding on what to do next.



During her time as Attorney General, Bondi came under immense scrutiny for the DOJ's handling of documents related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Congress had passed a law earlier that obligated the DOJ to release all of the files by a certain deadline. However, the instructions set in the law were allegedly not followed by the Justice Department. "Oversight Democrats have been leading serious investigations into Bondi and Secretary Kristi Noem. If they think we are moving on because they were fired, they are gravely mistaken," Rep. Robert Garcia (D-CA) was quoted by Axios as saying. Questions were raised about missed deadlines, heavy redaction of information, and non-redaction of the identity of the victims.  



Several U.S. lawmakers believe that the former Attorney General used the Justice Department to protect President Donald Trump. "Pam Bondi's legacy will be the weaponization of the world's preeminent law enforcement agency for Trump's personal benefit," Sen. Dick Durbin said. He also claimed that Bondi was fired because she did not do enough to "appease" Trump. While her handling of the Epstein files was one of the primary reasons behind her getting the boot, reports suggest that Bondi was not able to successfully indict Trump’s adversaries. A CNN report claimed that a deleted social media post by Trump urged her to indict former FBI Director James Comey, New York Attorney General Letitia James, and Sen. Adam Schiff of California.

U.S. President Donald Trump interacts with then U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi. (Photo by Roberto Schmidt/Getty Images)
U.S. President Donald Trump interacts with then U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi. (Image Source: Getty Images | Photo by Roberto Schmidt)

It's not just the House Oversight Committee that Bondi has to worry about in the near future. Three fired FBI agents have filed a suit against the agency and the Justice Department, claiming that they were involved in an illegal "retribution campaign" against them for investigating President Trump's efforts to overturn the result of the 2020 election. According to a Politico report, the suit names FBI Director Kash Patel and Bondi. Michelle Ball, Jamie Garman, and Blaire Toleman were fired without notice last year, despite having years of "exemplary and unblemished" service. Their investigation into Trump led to an indictment by special counsel Jack Smith in 2023.

MORE STORIES

Trump's remarks came just a day after Blanche testified before a House Appropriations subcommittee about the DOJ's 'anti-weaponization fund'
4 hours ago
Reich shared a video in which he explained three ways in which the President was trying to "sabotage our elections"
4 hours ago
Earlier, Pam Bondi had reportedly pointed the finger squarely at Blanche and Patel for the handling of the Epstein files
5 hours ago
"We're building something in front of the White House that's quite attractive to a lot of people," President Trump said
6 hours ago
"Good people were silenced because they stood up for our audience," Pelley said in a statement
8 hours ago
Several Democrats questioned Bill Pulte's appointment as the Acting Director of National Intelligence
8 hours ago
While most presidents release the results of a medical exam once per year, Trump has gone through four since taking office
11 hours ago
Ivey rebuked the Acting Attorney General's claim that the U.S. Constitution allows the president to grant pardons without explanation
11 hours ago
"It will eliminate some jobs, and those jobs will have to be replaced with new jobs," Rubio said
1 day ago
AI is on track to generate trillions in wealth, and right now virtually all of it flows to a handful of private shareholders, according to Sanders
1 day ago